-$Id: Changes,v 1.36 2007-06-27 22:44:13 mike Exp $
+$Id: Changes,v 1.46 2008-05-28 10:03:53 mike Exp $
Revision history for the CQL-Java package.
See the bottom of this file for a list of things still to do.
-1.0 [IN PROGRESS]
+The work for releases 1.0, 1.2 and 1.2.1 was sponsored by the National
+Library of Australia, whose help we gratefully acknowledge.
+
+1.4 [IN PROGRESS]
+ - Add support for interpreting sequences of non-keywords as a
+ single multi-word term rather than a broken INDEX RELATION
+ TERM triplet. This means that "oxford street" is a valid
+ query rather than a syntax error, and "tottenham court road"
+ is what it looks like rather than a search for the word
+ "court" related by the relation "court" to the index
+ "tottenham". Note that the word-formed relations "all" and
+ "exact" (### and others?) are still treated specially.
+ ### Not yet done
+
+1.3 Wed May 28 11:02:00 BST 2008
+ - Add getSortIndexes() to CQLSortNode, as suggested by Marcel
+ Versteeg <Marcel.Versteeg@KB.nl>
+
+1.2.1 Mon Aug 6 16:54:54 BST 2007
+ - Contructors for the CQLParser class are made public (as they
+ should have been all along).
+
+1.2 Tue Jul 3 17:53:28 BST 2007
- Support for CQL version 1.2 as described at
- http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/next-version.html
- based on support for version 1.1 as described at
- http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/cql/
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/next-version.html
+ The most significant part of the v1.2 change is support for
+ sorting, but as of this writing (29th June) the official SRU
+ maintenance agency web site at
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/index.html
+ does not include any specification for CQL sorting.
+ Therefore the original proposal at
+ http://zing.z3950.org/cql/sorting.html
+ is still considered canonical.
+
+1.0 Fri Jun 29 14:10:28 BST 2007
+ - Support for version 1.1 as described at
+ http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/specs/cql.html
Since this is a significant leap forward, the version
numbering increases to the next major version.
- "Qualifiers" renamed as "indexes" throughout, to match what