Example Configurations Overview zebraidx and zebrasrv are both driven by a master configuration file, which may refer to other subsidiary configuration files. By default, they try to use zebra.cfg in the working directory as the master file; but this can be changed using the -c option to specify an alternative master configuration file. The master configuration file tells &zebra;: Where to find subsidiary configuration files, including both those that are named explicitly and a few ``magic'' files such as default.idx, which specifies the default indexing rules. What record schemas to support. (Subsidiary files specify how to index the contents of records in those schemas, and what format to use when presenting records in those schemas to client software.) What attribute sets to recognise in searches. (Subsidiary files specify how to interpret the attributes in terms of the indexes that are created on the records.) Policy details such as what type of input format to expect when adding new records, what low-level indexing algorithm to use, how to identify potential duplicate records, etc. Now let's see what goes in the zebra.cfg file for some example configurations. Example 1: &acro.xml; Indexing And Searching This example shows how &zebra; can be used with absolutely minimal configuration to index a body of &acro.xml; documents, and search them using XPath expressions to specify access points. Go to the examples/zthes subdirectory of the distribution archive. There you will find a Makefile that will populate the records subdirectory with a file of Zthes records representing a taxonomic hierarchy of dinosaurs. (The records are generated from the family tree in the file dino.tree.) Type make records/dino.xml to make the &acro.xml; data file. (Or you could just type make dino to build the &acro.xml; data file, create the database and populate it with the taxonomic records all in one shot - but then you wouldn't learn anything, would you? :-) Now we need to create a &zebra; database to hold and index the &acro.xml; records. We do this with the &zebra; indexer, zebraidx, which is driven by the zebra.cfg configuration file. For our purposes, we don't need any special behaviour - we can use the defaults - so we can start with a minimal file that just tells zebraidx where to find the default indexing rules, and how to parse the records: profilePath: .:../../tab recordType: grs.sgml That's all you need for a minimal &zebra; configuration. Now you can roll the &acro.xml; records into the database and build the indexes: zebraidx update records Now start the server. Like the indexer, its behaviour is controlled by the zebra.cfg file; and like the indexer, it works just fine with this minimal configuration. zebrasrv By default, the server listens on IP port number 9999, although this can easily be changed - see . Now you can use the &acro.z3950; client program of your choice to execute XPath-based boolean queries and fetch the &acro.xml; records that satisfy them: $ yaz-client @:9999 Connecting...Ok. Z> find @attr 1=/Zthes/termName Sauroposeidon Number of hits: 1 Z> format xml Z> show 1 <Zthes> <termId>22</termId> <termName>Sauroposeidon</termName> <termType>PT</termType> <termNote>The tallest known dinosaur (18m)</termNote> <relation> <relationType>BT</relationType> <termId>21</termId> <termName>Brachiosauridae</termName> <termType>PT</termType> </relation> <idzebra xmlns="http://www.indexdata.dk/zebra/"> <size>300</size> <localnumber>23</localnumber> <filename>records/dino.xml</filename> </idzebra> </Zthes> Now wasn't that nice and easy? Example 2: Supporting Interoperable Searches The problem with the previous example is that you need to know the structure of the documents in order to find them. For example, when we wanted to find the record for the taxon Sauroposeidon, we had to formulate a complex XPath /Zthes/termName which embodies the knowledge that taxon names are specified in a <termName> element inside the top-level <Zthes> element. This is bad not just because it requires a lot of typing, but more significantly because it ties searching semantics to the physical structure of the searched records. You can't use the same search specification to search two databases if their internal representations are different. Consider a different taxonomy database in which the records have taxon names specified inside a <name> element nested within a <identification> element inside a top-level <taxon> element: then you'd need to search for them using 1=/taxon/identification/name How, then, can we build broadcasting Information Retrieval applications that look for records in many different databases? The &acro.z3950; protocol offers a powerful and general solution to this: abstract ``access points''. In the &acro.z3950; model, an access point is simply a point at which searches can be directed. Nothing is said about implementation: in a given database, an access point might be implemented as an index, a path into physical records, an algorithm for interrogating relational tables or whatever works. The only important thing is that the semantics of an access point is fixed and well defined. For convenience, access points are gathered into attribute sets. For example, the &acro.bib1; attribute set is supposed to contain bibliographic access points such as author, title, subject and ISBN; the GEO attribute set contains access points pertaining to geospatial information (bounding coordinates, stratum, latitude resolution, etc.); the CIMI attribute set contains access points to do with museum collections (provenance, inscriptions, etc.) In practice, the &acro.bib1; attribute set has tended to be a dumping ground for all sorts of access points, so that, for example, it includes some geospatial access points as well as strictly bibliographic ones. Nevertheless, this model allows a layer of abstraction over the physical representation of records in databases. In the &acro.bib1; attribute set, a taxon name is probably best interpreted as a title - that is, a phrase that identifies the item in question. &acro.bib1; represents title searches by access point 4. (See The &acro.bib1; Attribute Set Semantics) So we need to configure our dinosaur database so that searches for &acro.bib1; access point 4 look in the <termName> element, inside the top-level <Zthes> element. This is a two-step process. First, we need to tell &zebra; that we want to support the &acro.bib1; attribute set. Then we need to tell it which elements of its record pertain to access point 4. We need to create an Abstract Syntax file named after the document element of the records we're working with, plus a .abs suffix - in this case, Zthes.abs - as follows: attset zthes.att attset bib1.att xpath enable systag sysno none xelm /Zthes/termId termId:w xelm /Zthes/termName termName:w,title:w xelm /Zthes/termQualifier termQualifier:w xelm /Zthes/termType termType:w xelm /Zthes/termLanguage termLanguage:w xelm /Zthes/termNote termNote:w xelm /Zthes/termCreatedDate termCreatedDate:w xelm /Zthes/termCreatedBy termCreatedBy:w xelm /Zthes/termModifiedDate termModifiedDate:w xelm /Zthes/termModifiedBy termModifiedBy:w Declare Thesaurus attribute set. See zthes.att. Declare &acro.bib1; attribute set. See bib1.att in &zebra;'s tab directory. This xelm directive selects contents of nodes by XPath expression /Zthes/termId. The contents (CDATA) will be word searchable by Zthes attribute termId (value 1001). Make termName word searchable by both Zthes attribute termName (1002) and &acro.bib1; attribute title (4). After re-indexing, we can search the database using &acro.bib1; attribute, title, as follows: Z> form xml Z> f @attr 1=4 Eoraptor Sent searchRequest. Received SearchResponse. Search was a success. Number of hits: 1, setno 1 SearchResult-1: Eoraptor(1) records returned: 0 Elapsed: 0.106896 Z> s Sent presentRequest (1+1). Records: 1 [Default]Record type: &acro.xml; <Zthes> <termId>2</termId> <termName>Eoraptor</termName> <termType>PT</termType> <termNote>The most basal known dinosaur</termNote> ...