X-Git-Url: http://git.indexdata.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=rfc1006%2Frfct.c;h=b1222ec11763abdbaa40249b7274c624259e2654;hb=7826e2c92b1a07182ba5bfb94c304f1fa7d27387;hp=8bcda3c1d61dd9345ac8789135070793804a5721;hpb=225a451c3b6a46e0034060affad7df94b18ba3aa;p=yaz-moved-to-github.git diff --git a/rfc1006/rfct.c b/rfc1006/rfct.c index 8bcda3c..b1222ec 100644 --- a/rfc1006/rfct.c +++ b/rfc1006/rfct.c @@ -4,7 +4,22 @@ * Sebastian Hammer, Adam Dickmeiss * * $Log: rfct.c,v $ - * Revision 1.3 1995-05-16 09:37:18 quinn + * Revision 1.8 1995-11-01 13:54:52 quinn + * Minor adjustments + * + * Revision 1.7 1995/06/16 10:46:48 quinn + * *** empty log message *** + * + * Revision 1.6 1995/06/15 07:45:11 quinn + * Moving to v3. + * + * Revision 1.5 1995/05/31 08:29:35 quinn + * Nothing significant. + * + * Revision 1.4 1995/05/18 13:02:07 quinn + * Smallish. + * + * Revision 1.3 1995/05/16 09:37:18 quinn * Fixed bug * * Revision 1.2 1995/05/02 08:53:09 quinn @@ -69,11 +84,11 @@ /* * Simple implementation of XTI/TP0/RFC1006/Sockets. - * Note: This is neither complete nor robust. It just has to tick us over - * until mr. Furniss finishes his own implementation. + * Note: There is still some work to do in here, but basically it works. * * TODO: Asynchronous mode needs a lot of little adjustments to various - * return values and error codes, etc. + * return values and error codes, etc. Formally, we should probably hold + * this up against the protocol state tables, and see if it's correct. * * Check if addressing info is returned correctly by all calls. */ @@ -99,7 +114,6 @@ #ifdef __linux__ #include #endif -#include /* project memory debugging - delete if you don't have it */ #ifdef TRACE_TRANSPORT #define TRC(x) x @@ -249,7 +263,7 @@ int t_open(char *name, int oflag, struct t_info *info) cnt->oci[i] = -1; /* - * RFC1006 sets a higher than standard default max TPDU size, but the + * RFC1006 sets a higher than standard (TP) default max TPDU size, but the * Isode seems to like to negotiate it down. We'll keep it here to be * safe. Note that there's no harm in jumping it up. If it's higher * than 2048, t_connect won't try to negotiate. @@ -713,6 +727,8 @@ int _t_rcv(int fd, char *buf, unsigned nbytes, int *flags) return got; } +#if 1 + int t_rcv(int fd, char *buf, unsigned nbytes, int *flags) { int res; @@ -730,6 +746,8 @@ int t_rcv(int fd, char *buf, unsigned nbytes, int *flags) return total; } +#endif + int t_close(int fd) { struct rfct_control *cnt = control[fd]; @@ -777,6 +795,12 @@ static int t_look_wait(int fd, int wait) return T_LISTEN; /* the only possible type of event */ if ((res = read_n(fd, (char*) &head, 6)) < 0) return -1; + if (res == 0) + { + TRC(fprintf(stderr, "Network disconnect\n")); + return cnt->event = T_DISCONNECT; + } + TRC(fprintf(stderr, "t_look got %d bytes\n", res)); if (head.version != RFC_VERSION) { TRC(fprintf(stderr, "Got bad RFC1006 version in t_look: %d.\n",